Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Horizon Finance Path
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-17 13:14:10
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (44226)
Related
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Alaska ombudsman says Adult Protective Services’ negligent handling of vulnerable adult led to death
- Josh Groban never gave up his dream of playing 'Sweeney Todd'
- Speaker Johnson insists he’s sticking to budget deal but announces no plan to stop partial shutdown
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- How much do surrogates make and cost? People describe the real-life dollars and cents of surrogacy.
- After years of delays, former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern ties the knot
- Sam's Club announces it will stop checking receipts and start using AI at exits
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Florida school district pulls dictionaries and encyclopedias as part of inappropriate content review
Ranking
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- After years of delays, former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern ties the knot
- A mudslide in Colombia’s west kills at least 18 people and injures dozens others
- Alabama is close to hiring Kalen DeBoer from Washington to replace Nick Saban, AP source says
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- West Virginia Senate OKs bill to allow veterans, retired police to provide armed security in schools
- 1 man presumed dead, 2 rescued after avalanche hits Idaho mountain, authorities say
- War in Gaza, election factor into some of the many events planned for MLK holiday
Recommendation
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Hertz is selling Teslas for as little as $21,000, as it offloads the pricey EVs from its rental fleet
NFL All-Pro: McCaffrey, Hill, Warner unanimous; 14 first-timers
Man dies, brother survives after both fall into freezing pond while ice fishing in New York
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
DOJ seeks death penalty for man charged in racist mass shooting at grocery store in Buffalo
Watch this little girl with progressive hearing loss get a furry new best friend
Alabama is close to hiring Kalen DeBoer from Washington to replace Nick Saban, AP source says